Look things up here when you know what you are looking for: all 151 entries alphabetically, filterable by type.
151 All
When several emotional protective factors have to be built up in parallel for long-term stabilization.
Also in: Distress Tolerance
When what is needed is not primarily acute crisis regulation, but rather the long-term development of positive counterweights, joy and closeness to life.
Also in: Distress Tolerance · Mindfulness
When good interaction depends on understanding, questioning and self-advocacy being held together instead of just reacting or just arguing.
Also in: Mindfulness
When, before a conversation, not just the attitude but a concrete linguistic form is needed for a request, limit or feedback.
When something familiar needs to be looked at anew to subvert automatic judgments, cynicism or routine blindness.
Also in: Interpersonal Effectiveness
When skills training needs a clear target protocol that makes behavioral focus and prioritization directly manageable.
If, before skill work, it must first be understood why strong emotional reactivity and being misunderstood reinforce each other.
Also in: Emotion Regulation
When stabilization requires not only reassurance, but also noticeable competence, success in action and inner uprightness.
When not only preparing for a single challenge, but also building a basic feeling of manageability and ability to cope with it.
When preventive stabilization and mental preparation must be specifically planned.
If you want to understand a problematic pattern step by step backwards.
Also in: Distress Tolerance · Emotion Regulation · Interpersonal Effectiveness
When a problematic episode should be reconstructed step by step with a clear chain analysis worksheet.
If before opposing action or problem solving, it must first be checked whether the emotion and its intensity are appropriate to the facts.
When a fact check should be worked through in writing and not just mentally.
When the real problem is not an acute crisis, but rather dangerous carelessness or relapse blindness.
If, before making a change, it must first be understood which thinking habits perpetuate emotional problems.
When there is ambivalence about change, therapy goals are unclear, or a new commitment to a skill or target behavior needs to be built.
If you need to look back and see where a conversation was effective or unclear.
Also in: Emotion Regulation · Mindfulness
When sustainable change depends on the environment supporting behavior instead of constantly undermining it.
Also in: Interpersonal Effectiveness · Emotion Regulation
When behavior is to be systematically shaped via reward, reinforcement or consequences.
Also in: Emotion Regulation · Interpersonal Effectiveness
When behavior management requires a concrete contingency management protocol that makes rules and the logic of consequences directly usable.
When upcoming appointments, conversations, conflicts or risky situations should not be handled spontaneously, but rather with foresight.
When an acute crisis cannot be solved immediately and the main danger lies in making things worse through impulsive action.
When a linked signal is intended to lead the body into relaxation more quickly.
If mindfulness is to be developed permanently and a regular practice structure is needed.
If you want to build an everyday life that regularly nourishes emotional stability instead of just reacting to crises.
Also in: Mindfulness · Distress Tolerance · Emotion Regulation · Interpersonal Effectiveness
If it is not yet clear which module or skill is right and therefore the overall DBT picture is needed first.
If progress, triggers and skill usage should be made visible over time.
When a higher-level view of the planning, composition and sequence of the training program is needed.
When clear session logic is needed for training, adaptation or understanding of the format.
When a structured overview of training goals and standard procedures is necessary before going deeper into modules or individual skills.
When not only the what, but the strategic how of skills training should be understood.
When primary reassurance, relationship protection or self-respect are not the priority, but rather the specific goal of the interaction must be pursued clearly and effectively.
Also in: Mindfulness · Emotion Regulation
If there is content, but attitude, demeanor or inner security must support the issue even better.
If a conversation otherwise remains non-binding and the core message must be clearly stated.
When at the beginning of a difficult conversation, facts and observations need to be clarified before requests or feelings follow.
If after the description it should also be clear how the situation feels or affects you.
When you already know what you want to say, but easily lose focus under pressure or resistance.
When clarity should be maintained, but a rigid course would block the solution rather than promote it.
When clarity of purpose alone is not enough and the conversation needs additional motivation for approval or cooperation.
When what is observed must be named in order to distinguish between fact and attribution or to facilitate feedback, classification and regulation.
When, before actually choosing a skill, a dialectical framework is needed to maintain tension between two seemingly opposing truths.
When abstinence or change goals require clear determination and a flexible return to the course.
When rigid positions are present, emotional escalation arises from fixed stances, or therapeutic progress stalls.
Helpful when acute strain, high tension, or the question of what needs to be stabilized first is in the foreground.
If, before further activism or withdrawal, it must first be clarified whether doing or being is the more harmonious mode.
Also in: Distress Tolerance · Emotion Regulation
When the key question is no longer what would be ideal, but rather what actually helps in this situation.
When a feeling not only has to be understood, but also endured within a protected framework so that its power over behavior decreases.
Helpful when you want to understand how emotions are built, which levers make change possible, and where to enter the module.
If it is still unclear whether fact checking, opposing action, problem solving or vulnerability reduction is the appropriate next step.
Also in: Mindfulness · Distress Tolerance · Interpersonal Effectiveness
Before concrete modules or skills it must first become clear what is actually meant by emotional dysregulation in DBT.
Also in: Mindfulness · Distress Tolerance · Emotion Regulation
When what is needed is not relationship repair or better negotiation, but clear distancing, separation or a final discussion.
Also in: Emotion Regulation · Distress Tolerance
When effective reactions must be practiced in advance so that they are available in the real moment.
When interactions typically leave behind self-devaluation, bitterness or the feeling of having lost or betrayed oneself.
If you want to protect yourself without being unfair or degrading towards others.
When you have to stand up for something that doesn't need an apology, but otherwise you quickly make yourself smaller than necessary.
When in contact, commitment to values becomes more important than short-term relief, approval or conflict avoidance.
When self-respect depends on remaining clear and truthful in contact, even when it is uncomfortable.
When, after fact-checking, you need to choose the appropriate next path for an unwanted feeling.
When, before regulation or behavioral change, it must first be understood what an emotion actually stands for in the current context.
Also in: Mindfulness · Distress Tolerance
When a single skill is not needed immediately, but rather an overall functional orientation towards behavior and its analysis.
When values are important but still need to be translated into concrete, feasible steps.
When a relationship needs to be protected, repaired or kept socially open in contact and the guiding question is not just the goal or self-respect.
When relationship openness benefits from the pressure and heaviness being relaxed somewhat without trivializing the issue.
When clarity is needed, but without additional harshness that puts unnecessary strain on the relationship.
When openness in a relationship depends on you clearly sticking with the other person and not just with your own goals.
When relationship openness and defusing depend on the other person feeling understood.
When there is a feeling and you need to clarify the next effective change step.
When you need to clarify not only what you want to say, but also how clearly you should say it.
If the secondary overload of the moment should be reduced so that perseverance, thinking and later skill use become possible again.
Helpful when conflicts, requests, boundaries, or relationship questions should be understood not just situationally but as part of a larger module structure.
Before choosing an interpersonal skill, it must first be clarified whether goals, relationships or self-respect are the guiding criteria.
When, before self-blame or pure symptom description, it must first be understood what part the environment can play in escalation and instability.
When gentle validation brings no movement, or an unexpected impulse is therapeutically more effective than direct addressing.
If it is unclear whether you need a complete bundle or a specific discussion template.
When it's unclear whether you need to calm down or make the whole moment more bearable.
If it is unclear whether you still have to turn back to acceptance or go on standby.
When it is unclear whether a perspective needs to be validated first or whether it needs to be made negotiable on both sides.
When it is unclear whether an experience needs to be validated or a fact needs to be accepted.
Also in: Interpersonal Effectiveness · Distress Tolerance
If, before detailed work, an orientation overview of the structure and structure of the manual is needed.
When mindfulness should not only be neutrally observing, but also expressly friendly and benevolent.
When compassion should not remain abstract, but should be practiced as a concrete practice for yourself or others.
When black and white patterns have to be softened so that more than one seemingly only correct position becomes conceivable.
Also in: Distress Tolerance · Interpersonal Effectiveness
If you don't just want to understand Middle Path once, but want to practice it practically over a period of days.
Helpful when you first want to understand how mindfulness works as a basic organizing principle and which concepts belong together in this space.
When it is not the next content but the inner execution attitude of mindfulness that needs to be clarified.
When emotion avoidance magnifies the problem and mindful contact with the present feeling is needed first.
When current feelings should be kept mindful and not just classified conceptually.
When contact requires a more conscious awareness of the other person before you react, judge or negotiate.
If, before individual what skills, a common overview of observing, describing and participating is needed.
When missing intermediate steps and skill gaps should be made visible with a clear worksheet.
If it is not clear which effective step has been missing in a difficult situation.
When not only one person needs to be validated, but the relationship thrives on both perspectives becoming comprehensible.
When sleep is not just stabilized in general, but a recurring nightmare or dream-related nighttime stress needs to be dealt with specifically.
When before further understanding or action, the evaluative narrowness must first be released so that reality can be seen more precisely again.
When, before speech, evaluation or action, one must first gather what is actually happening internally or externally.
When what is needed is not more content but less fragmentation so that the current step can be taken whole again.
If Check the Facts speaks against the emotional reaction direction and the situation itself does not need to be changed primarily.
When counteracting action should be specifically prepared and not just understood.
When, before choosing a skill, you first have to decide what kind of answer suits the problem.
When in a contact not only demarcation or evaluation, but also conscious compassion for the other person should be exercised.
When Observe and Describe have already done their clarifying job and the situation now needs more presence, flow or immediate follow-through than further analysis.
When the body has to be downregulated first before other skills can even be accessed again.
When dialectical abstinence has to be translated into a real written relapse-and-return plan instead of remaining a good principle.
When not only acute regulation is needed, but the reduction of basic vulnerability via everyday body factors.
If physical self-care is to be built as a daily practice.
When Check the Facts shows that it is not the emotion that should be corrected, but the real problem situation that should be dealt with.
When a real problem needs to be gradually translated into workable solutions.
When you want to not only understand Options for Solving Any Problem but concretely weigh the decision for effective skill use.
When ABC skills should not remain isolated, but should be developed as a daily overall practice.
When what is needed is not primary understanding or change, but rather recognition of facticity.
When the therapeutic relationship is characterized by artificiality or lack of warmth, or when clients want to understand therapist behavior transparently.
When several interests have to be brought together in a negotiation or difficult vote without losing sight of the actual goal.
When something painful has to be fully accepted because resistance makes the state worse.
If before emotion regulation, checking the facts or choosing a skill, it must first be recognized more clearly what is actually happening emotionally.
When, after invalidating experiences, a concrete framework for action is needed to work through impact, self-relation, and next steps in an ordered way.
When community reinforcement needs to be translated into concrete new rewards, routines, and alternatives that support abstinence in everyday life.
When complete withdrawal is not necessary, but a conscious interruption is needed before further skills or decisions are made.
When inner images of security are needed to reduce excitement and overwhelm.
When what is needed is not primary analysis or performance, but a compassionate and at the same time sustainable self-attitude in order to become capable of acting again.
When reassurance, body regulation or a non-punitive form of self-care are needed before problem solving, emotion regulation or interpersonal skills.
When skills training requires a practical protocol that makes typical procedures directly usable.
When the target sequence must first be clarified before concrete interventions so that training and focus remain effective.
When not only individual nights are difficult, but sleep as a recurring stress amplifier must be systematically improved.
When sleep problems worsen the situation and concrete practice is needed instead of just knowledge.
When you don't want to create more analysis or action, but rather a state of calm, openness and less internal pressure.
When skills training needs a concrete session protocol that puts review, teaching, practice, and transfer to everyday life into a fixed sequence.
When emotional vulnerability is to be practically reduced and not just understood.
If before any further analysis, communication or regulation, the reflexive further reaction must first be stopped.
When a short observation step is needed between stopping and moving on to reassess the situation.
When, after stopping and distancing yourself, it is no longer necessary to simply inhibit yourself, but to continue to act carefully.
When differentiated further thinking is not yet possible and the blind pursuit must first be stopped.
When it is not necessary to intervene immediately, but rather to gain a small distance so that you do not continue to act reflexively.
When it needs to become clear how therapists flexibly switch between warmth and challenge to promote change.
If, before actually choosing a skill, a model is needed that breaks down emotional reactions into their components and points of intervention.
When what is needed is not primary understanding or talking, but rather quick, body-oriented crisis regulation.
When high tension not only calms you down, it should first be physically reduced so that other skills can take action.
When acute tension requires immediate, close-to-the-body and discreet regulation.
When physical alertness needs to be specifically regulated via muscle and tension levels.
When the TIP skills need to be regulated particularly quickly via the body and not via language or cognition.
When a micro-movement is needed between understanding an acceptance skill and concrete application.
When de-escalation, resonance or understandable classification are needed first.
When it needs to become clear what validation means in contrast to agreement – or when the relationship between validation and change needs to be understood.
When not just a single moment, but the ongoing weekly structure for regulation and skill use should be supported.
If you first want to understand how a bundle is structured and which parts belong together.
Also in: Mindfulness · Interpersonal Effectiveness · Emotion Regulation
If you have to differentiate between immediate aid and longer-term development.
When several skills sound similar but do not have the same task.
Also in: Emotion Regulation · Distress Tolerance · Interpersonal Effectiveness
When fighting against facts creates more suffering and reality work becomes necessary.
If you don't want to search first, but rather find the right first skill room.
When defiant, rigid or passive denial blocks the effective response.
When, before the next step, an inner orientation is needed that takes both feelings and reason seriously.